Vibeprint icon

Vibeprint

by benerkanrzgc@gmail.com · Developer Tools
Manifest V3 Free
View in Chrome Web Store Data as of 16 Oct 2026

Scans the current page on demand for signals that it was built with an AI coding tool or no-code AI app builder.

Users
5
−1 in 30 days
Rating
0.0 / 5
unchanged in 30 days
Ratings
0
0 in 30 days
Store rank
#258K
#215K among extensions
Version
0.1.0
updated 14 Aug 2026

Users

monthly, 2 months
048Aug 2026Oct 2026Oct 2026
Latest, 16 Oct 2026: 5 usersMove the mouse over the chart for any month

Ratings count

monthly, 2 months
001Aug 2026Oct 2026Oct 2026
Latest, 16 Oct 2026: 0 ratingsMove the mouse over the chart for any month

The Chrome Web Store rounds user counts down to the leading digit, so the user line moves in steps. The ratings count is exact and is the better signal of real adoption.

About Vibeprint

Vibeprint tells you whether the page you're on was likely built with an AI coding tool — Lovable, Bolt.new, Base44 — and shows you exactly which signals it found. It also recognises visual builders — Framer, Webflow, Wix and Replit — and is careful to say that those identify the tool rather than prove AI authorship. Click the toolbar icon. It reads the page, matches it against known builder fingerprints, and gives you a verdict with the evidence behind it. Nothing runs until you click. WHAT MAKES IT DIFFERENT Most of the guesswork in this space is vibes. Vibeprint is calibrated against 71 real websites captured live, with published accuracy numbers: precision 1.000, recall 0.967. The hand-built half deliberately includes the hardest cases — sites like vercel.com and ui.shadcn.com that use the exact fonts, components and dark gradient aesthetic people associate with AI output. None of them are falsely accused. EVIDENCE, NOT ACCUSATIONS Every verdict comes with a breakdown, grouped by how much it actually proves: • Conclusive — identifies a specific builder (a hosted runtime script, a generator tag) • Suggestive — common in generated code, but not exclusive to it • Circumstantial — also seen on hand-built sites A confident verdict requires conclusive evidence. Buzzwords, a default font, and platform hosting can never add up to an accusation on their own — that rule is enforced in code, not just intended. HONEST ABOUT LIMITS A site can be AI-built and leave no trace. Builders that host what they generate (Lovable, Bolt, Base44, Framer) leave fingerprints behind, but only Lovable, Bolt and Base44's fingerprints prove AI authorship — Framer's proves only which tool was used. Tools like v0 hand you code you deploy yourself, leaving nothing to detect. When there's no evidence, Vibeprint says "Not enough signal" instead of guessing. That's a real answer, not a failure. PRIVACY • The page is read in memory only, while you look at the result — nothing is kept • No network requests — nothing leaves your browser, ever • No background process, no content scripts, no storage • No host permissions: it cannot touch a page you haven't asked it to scan • Fully open source Permissions used: activeTab (temporary access to the current tab, only when you click) and scripting (to run the reader on that page). Source code and accuracy methodology: https://github.com/erkanrzgc/vibeprint

Growth

WindowUsersChangeRatingsRating
7 days0+0.0%00.00
30 days−1−16.7%00.00

Version history

1 versions recorded
0.1.014 Aug 2026

Details

Category
Developer Tools
First seen
14 Aug 2026
Size
78 KB
Languages
en
Pricing
Free
Privacy policy
erkanrzgc.github.io
Support
github.com
Extension ID
gemfoaodgghjopicijcobkcmnjpmhdpj

Permissions and risk

Minimal riskimpact 0, likelihood 3
Permissions
activeTabscripting

Alternatives to Vibeprint

Extensions that rank for the same store searches or share the Developer Tools category, ordered by users