Evaluate source authority, evidence strength, and communication quality for YouTube, podcasts, and articles.
Users
3
−1 in 30 days
Rating
0.0 / 5
unchanged in 30 days
Ratings
0
0 in 30 days
Store rank
#304K
#246K among extensions
Version
1.2.0
updated 20 Jul 2026
Users
monthly, 3 months
Latest, 15 Oct 2026:3 usersMove the mouse over the chart for any month
Ratings count
monthly, 3 months
Latest, 15 Oct 2026:0 ratingsMove the mouse over the chart for any month
The Chrome Web Store rounds user counts down to the leading digit, so the user line moves in steps. The ratings count is exact and is the better signal of real adoption.
About Evidence Lens
Get informed on how reliable the knowledge is on YouTube podcasts like The
Diary Of A CEO, Huberman Lab, and Lex Fridman — Evidence Lens helps you look
at information through the lens of evidence.
Not "is this true?" — that's not a question a browser extension should
answer for you. Instead, Evidence Lens asks the questions that actually
determine how much confidence to place in something before you trust it:
• Is the source a credible authority on this specific topic?
• Is the supporting evidence strong?
• Was that evidence communicated faithfully — or oversold?
• Can you independently verify it yourself?
While you watch YouTube or read Medium, Evidence Lens shows a Knowledge
Signal next to the content:
▮▮▮ Worth Watching
▮▮☐ Watch Critically
▮☐☐ Verify Before Trusting
Click it for the "why" — source credibility, evidence strength, and
communication integrity, broken down separately. For interviews and
podcasts, Evidence Lens evaluates the guest, the host, and the content
separately, since a weak host lets bad claims go unchallenged even when
everything else looks credible.
WHAT IT CHECKS
• Source: does this person's expertise actually match this topic —
and are their credentials verified through live web search, or only
self-reported?
• Facilitator: does the host/interviewer challenge claims and ask for
evidence, or just let anything pass?
• Content: are the load-bearing claims consistent with established
knowledge, or just asserted with confidence?
A free surface-level signal appears automatically on every video. An
optional detailed report — which verifies the guest/host's credentials
through live web search — is available on request.
Evidence Lens flags (without penalizing on their own) promotional framing,
one-sided claims, and sensational language — these only count against a
signal when they're paired with weak or absent evidence. A strong,
well-supported recommendation isn't bias; an unsupported one dressed up
with confidence is what this catches.
REQUIRES YOUR OWN ANTHROPIC API KEY
Evidence Lens calls Anthropic's Claude API directly from your browser using
an API key you provide in Settings. Your key and cached scores stay in
your browser's local storage — nothing is sent to us, because there is no
"us" in the data path. See the privacy policy for exactly what leaves your
browser and where it goes.
Currently supports YouTube and Medium. News sites are intentionally out of
scope — Evidence Lens is built for explainers, tutorials, interviews, and
analysis, not contested current-events coverage.