Evidence Lens icon

Evidence Lens

by sanchit.gupta01@gmail.com · Education
Manifest V3 Free
View in Chrome Web Store Data as of 15 Oct 2026

Evaluate source authority, evidence strength, and communication quality for YouTube, podcasts, and articles.

Users
3
−1 in 30 days
Rating
0.0 / 5
unchanged in 30 days
Ratings
0
0 in 30 days
Store rank
#304K
#246K among extensions
Version
1.2.0
updated 20 Jul 2026

Users

monthly, 3 months
024Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Latest, 15 Oct 2026: 3 usersMove the mouse over the chart for any month

Ratings count

monthly, 3 months
001Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Latest, 15 Oct 2026: 0 ratingsMove the mouse over the chart for any month

The Chrome Web Store rounds user counts down to the leading digit, so the user line moves in steps. The ratings count is exact and is the better signal of real adoption.

About Evidence Lens

Get informed on how reliable the knowledge is on YouTube podcasts like The Diary Of A CEO, Huberman Lab, and Lex Fridman — Evidence Lens helps you look at information through the lens of evidence. Not "is this true?" — that's not a question a browser extension should answer for you. Instead, Evidence Lens asks the questions that actually determine how much confidence to place in something before you trust it: • Is the source a credible authority on this specific topic? • Is the supporting evidence strong? • Was that evidence communicated faithfully — or oversold? • Can you independently verify it yourself? While you watch YouTube or read Medium, Evidence Lens shows a Knowledge Signal next to the content: ▮▮▮ Worth Watching ▮▮☐ Watch Critically ▮☐☐ Verify Before Trusting Click it for the "why" — source credibility, evidence strength, and communication integrity, broken down separately. For interviews and podcasts, Evidence Lens evaluates the guest, the host, and the content separately, since a weak host lets bad claims go unchallenged even when everything else looks credible. WHAT IT CHECKS • Source: does this person's expertise actually match this topic — and are their credentials verified through live web search, or only self-reported? • Facilitator: does the host/interviewer challenge claims and ask for evidence, or just let anything pass? • Content: are the load-bearing claims consistent with established knowledge, or just asserted with confidence? A free surface-level signal appears automatically on every video. An optional detailed report — which verifies the guest/host's credentials through live web search — is available on request. Evidence Lens flags (without penalizing on their own) promotional framing, one-sided claims, and sensational language — these only count against a signal when they're paired with weak or absent evidence. A strong, well-supported recommendation isn't bias; an unsupported one dressed up with confidence is what this catches. REQUIRES YOUR OWN ANTHROPIC API KEY Evidence Lens calls Anthropic's Claude API directly from your browser using an API key you provide in Settings. Your key and cached scores stay in your browser's local storage — nothing is sent to us, because there is no "us" in the data path. See the privacy policy for exactly what leaves your browser and where it goes. Currently supports YouTube and Medium. News sites are intentionally out of scope — Evidence Lens is built for explainers, tutorials, interviews, and analysis, not contested current-events coverage.

Growth

WindowUsersChangeRatingsRating
7 days0+0.0%00.00
30 days−1−25.0%00.00

Version history

2 versions recorded
1.2.020 Jul 2026
1.1.010 Jul 2026

Details

Category
Education
First seen
10 Jul 2026
Size
1.1 MB
Languages
en-US
Pricing
Free
Privacy policy
drive.google.com
Extension ID
ejkbnbbeoflppjpfpcobpjjpdjhljdfn

Permissions and risk

Elevated riskimpact 3, likelihood 3
Permissions
storageunlimitedStoragesidePanelscriptingactiveTab
Site access
https://www.youtube.com/*https://youtube.com/*https://medium.com/*https://*.medium.com/*https://api.anthropic.com/*

Alternatives to Evidence Lens

Extensions that rank for the same store searches or share the Education category, ordered by users