


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GoogleDocsPDFViewer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chromeextensions.org/other/googledocspdfviewer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chromeextensions.org/other/googledocspdfviewer/</link>
	<description>Extend Your Google Chrome Browser</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:52:23 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shah Jahan</title>
		<link>http://www.chromeextensions.org/other/googledocspdfviewer/comment-page-1/#comment-16929</link>
		<dc:creator>Shah Jahan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chromeextensions.org/?p=473#comment-16929</guid>
		<description>@Marc Federico
You can open the links in Google Docs and then you have the link at the top of the page, where you can right click and download it to your heart&#039;s desire.

@TPReal
Thank you for this extension. So far only two or three links didn&#039;t work, but I eventually got them (I can&#039;t remember where was that because I read quite a lot pdfs on-line). Still, for example, at freepatents dot com the pdfs are embedded in page; those don&#039;t work, but I suppose that would greatly complicate things, if they could be done, at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Marc Federico<br />
You can open the links in Google Docs and then you have the link at the top of the page, where you can right click and download it to your heart&#8217;s desire.</p>
<p>@TPReal<br />
Thank you for this extension. So far only two or three links didn&#8217;t work, but I eventually got them (I can&#8217;t remember where was that because I read quite a lot pdfs on-line). Still, for example, at freepatents dot com the pdfs are embedded in page; those don&#8217;t work, but I suppose that would greatly complicate things, if they could be done, at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TPReal</title>
		<link>http://www.chromeextensions.org/other/googledocspdfviewer/comment-page-1/#comment-5874</link>
		<dc:creator>TPReal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 06:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chromeextensions.org/?p=473#comment-5874</guid>
		<description>For now, doc is not supported by the Viewer. I&#039;ll add it when it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For now, doc is not supported by the Viewer. I&#8217;ll add it when it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KristofferPwn</title>
		<link>http://www.chromeextensions.org/other/googledocspdfviewer/comment-page-1/#comment-5338</link>
		<dc:creator>KristofferPwn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 19:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chromeextensions.org/?p=473#comment-5338</guid>
		<description>Please include .doc. It&#039;s easy: http://docs.google.com/viewer?url=PATH.doc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please include .doc. It&#8217;s easy: <a href="http://docs.google.com/viewer?url=PATH.doc" rel="nofollow">http://docs.google.com/viewer?url=PATH.doc</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TPReal</title>
		<link>http://www.chromeextensions.org/other/googledocspdfviewer/comment-page-1/#comment-5293</link>
		<dc:creator>TPReal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 15:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chromeextensions.org/?p=473#comment-5293</guid>
		<description>Dear Marc.
As far as I know, currently it is not possible to intercept downloading a file and redirect the browser to the viewer. Your are right when you say that this would be better than just changing the links. But you are wrong when you say that the extension is useless in its current form. Maybe it&#039;s useless for you, but for me and a lot of other people this is enough.

When there&#039;s a way to intercept a download, I&#039;ll definitely rewrite it to what you suggest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Marc.<br />
As far as I know, currently it is not possible to intercept downloading a file and redirect the browser to the viewer. Your are right when you say that this would be better than just changing the links. But you are wrong when you say that the extension is useless in its current form. Maybe it&#8217;s useless for you, but for me and a lot of other people this is enough.</p>
<p>When there&#8217;s a way to intercept a download, I&#8217;ll definitely rewrite it to what you suggest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Federico</title>
		<link>http://www.chromeextensions.org/other/googledocspdfviewer/comment-page-1/#comment-4871</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Federico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 01:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chromeextensions.org/?p=473#comment-4871</guid>
		<description>TPReal, your viewer does not work at all, it needs to catch downloads that come through and not just allow for links clicked to be loaded in the viewer. completely useless because 99% of the time i am downloading a pdf and not clicking a link</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TPReal, your viewer does not work at all, it needs to catch downloads that come through and not just allow for links clicked to be loaded in the viewer. completely useless because 99% of the time i am downloading a pdf and not clicking a link</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TPReal</title>
		<link>http://www.chromeextensions.org/other/googledocspdfviewer/comment-page-1/#comment-4806</link>
		<dc:creator>TPReal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chromeextensions.org/?p=473#comment-4806</guid>
		<description>It does work. Give an example of a PDF that fails.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does work. Give an example of a PDF that fails.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dwjp90</title>
		<link>http://www.chromeextensions.org/other/googledocspdfviewer/comment-page-1/#comment-4426</link>
		<dc:creator>dwjp90</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 09:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chromeextensions.org/?p=473#comment-4426</guid>
		<description>Doesnt work, every pdf fails</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesnt work, every pdf fails</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TPReal</title>
		<link>http://www.chromeextensions.org/other/googledocspdfviewer/comment-page-1/#comment-4411</link>
		<dc:creator>TPReal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 08:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chromeextensions.org/?p=473#comment-4411</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not that it does nothing. I use it from time to time as I encounter sometimes links that are not automatically detected as links to PDF files. I agree that the button could be less exposed on the UI, but for that we&#039;ll have to wait until they&#039;ll add the ability to hide the browser action buttons. As far as I know, they&#039;re planning to do that in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not that it does nothing. I use it from time to time as I encounter sometimes links that are not automatically detected as links to PDF files. I agree that the button could be less exposed on the UI, but for that we&#8217;ll have to wait until they&#8217;ll add the ability to hide the browser action buttons. As far as I know, they&#8217;re planning to do that in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A,Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.chromeextensions.org/other/googledocspdfviewer/comment-page-1/#comment-4089</link>
		<dc:creator>A,Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 05:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chromeextensions.org/?p=473#comment-4089</guid>
		<description>Great extension, but is a button really necessary if it doesn&#039;t do anything ? It&#039;s just taking up space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great extension, but is a button really necessary if it doesn&#8217;t do anything ? It&#8217;s just taking up space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joep Hendriksson</title>
		<link>http://www.chromeextensions.org/other/googledocspdfviewer/comment-page-1/#comment-1985</link>
		<dc:creator>Joep Hendriksson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chromeextensions.org/?p=473#comment-1985</guid>
		<description>So I encounter problems on arXiv. For som obscure reason, they link to PDF&#039;s without extension, and googleDocs can&#039;t handle that at all (I guess). Here an example link:
http://arxiv.org/abs/0911.2226

The mimetype of this document is application/pdf, but it has no extension. 

I guess you are not able to solve the problem, however this is a very annoying problem...

For the rest, this application is quite ok!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I encounter problems on arXiv. For som obscure reason, they link to PDF&#8217;s without extension, and googleDocs can&#8217;t handle that at all (I guess). Here an example link:<br />
<a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/0911.2226" rel="nofollow">http://arxiv.org/abs/0911.2226</a></p>
<p>The mimetype of this document is application/pdf, but it has no extension. </p>
<p>I guess you are not able to solve the problem, however this is a very annoying problem&#8230;</p>
<p>For the rest, this application is quite ok!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
